Red alert 3 is definitly a more competitive game. Jan 10 2009, 20:25 PMĪng3lic Red alert 3 is definitly a more competitive game b. You should ask questions like these on other website like gamespot/ign/etc. Really it depends on your playstyle I personally prefer aoe and think aoe takes more skill then ra3 will ever have but thats me and alot of people are going to disagree ont he ra3 forum. Fighting for aoe doesn't normally start till 5 mins is the average rush. Eco was retarded wow you put an ore mine on an ore collector and just make sure it doesn't get attacked all game you don't get a ton of those you might get 5 by end game if the game lasts that long.Īlso do you like games that are fast paced or are a bit more slower paced. That was 1 of my biggest problems with RA3. I was expecting so much more but just epically dissapointing and a lot more noob friendly.Īoe3 takes alot more skill imo but this is a red alert 3 forum nobody is going to agree which is fine i'll prolly even get flamed for this.ĭo you like waiting 5 minutes or so getting a game then have it end in 5 minutes or do you prefer to wait 5 or so minutes getting a game and having it last on average 15-20 minutes? I started winning 15 games in a row losing 1 win alot more lose a couple and then I quit. Very dissapointing not as competitive as people said it was. I was getting sick of aoe(until fanpatch ). All right I have played both Aoe3 (still do actually) and Red Alert.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |